Obama

[sometimeman]

Yes, God's spirit resides in people. When he is no longer welcome the other spirit that moves in causes riots, killings and craziness. It's coming to our town folks.

Those who wish to bring America to its knees have destroyed our manufacturing base (NAFTA) our economy (the housing bubble) and are using race in the presidential campaign to foment strife and civil unrest.

I will probably die in the coming Marshall law phase.

[soaks]

Oct 10, 2008 10:32:24 GMT -4 bubbadebubba said:

Feeling a little paranoid soaks?

Nope, not at all.

[bubbadebubba]

""But seriously, folks, I'm beginning to worry about the level of craziness on the Republican side, the over-the-top, stampede-the-crowd statements by everyone from McCain on down,""

If you want craziness, read the articles in the Sentinel by the crazy democrat under articles titled "Leaning Left"

At least with the McCain crowd, it's at the national level.

With the crazy democrats in Union County, it's local and he's the forerunner of liberals taking over Union County along with soaks.

The right thing would be for Obama to take a position on anything, he only deals in generalities.
Voting present does count.
Until then he's not fit to lead the Country.


""His campaign is appalling, as the New York Times editorial board said today""

This is Union County in Georgia for God's sake; nobody believes the Times, your showing your liberalism soaks and you are out-numbered here.

[bubbadebubba]

"I will probably die in the coming Marshall law phase."

I will see you have a proper burial sometimeman.

[soaks]

Oct 10, 2008 10:43:24 GMT -4 bubbadebubba said:

...
With the crazy democrats in Union County, it's local and he's the forerunner of liberals taking over Union County along with soaks.
...
This is Union County in Georgia for God's sake; nobody believes the Times, your showing your liberalism soaks and you are out-numbered here.

Well, libralism is your boogeyman, and this is a very small pond.

[bubbadebubba]

Oct 10, 2008 10:54:43 GMT -4 soaks said:

Oct 10, 2008 10:43:24 GMT -4 bubbadebubba said:

...
With the crazy democrats in Union County, it's local and he's the forerunner of liberals taking over Union County along with soaks.
...
This is Union County in Georgia for God's sake; nobody believes the Times, your showing your liberalism soaks and you are out-numbered here.

Well, libralism is your boogeyman, and this is a very small pond.

I have no trouble dealing with boogeyman, I travel Booger Hollow rd a lot. It's the poison and stink in the pond that kills the fish and I'm trying to save the fish. I'm an Environmentalist.

[sometimeman]

FOR YOU SOAKS:


My name be Eboneesha Li Herenandez, an African-Hispanic-Asiatic-American girl who just gots an award For being the best speler in class.

I got 67% on the speling test and 30 points for being black, 5 points for not bringing drugs into class, 5 points for not bringing guns into class, and 5 points for not getting Pregnut during the cemester.

It be hard to beat a score of 120%.. The white dude who sit next to me is McGee from the Brooklyn . He got A 94% on the test but no extra points on account of he have the same Skin color as the opressirs of 150 years ago.

Granny ax me to thank all Dimocrafts and Liberals for suporting Afermative action. You be showing da way to true equality

I be gittin in medical skool nex an mabe I be yo doctor when da man take over da healtcare in dis cuntry.

[sometimeman]

OBAMA LACKS CREDENTIALS TO HOLD THE OFFICE OF PRESIDENT

Berg response in oppostion to Obama / DNC protective order
Thursday, 09 October 2008 21:38 administrator
E-mail Print

Attached is Philip J. Berg's Opposition to Defendants, the DNC and Obama's Motion for Protective Order Staying Discovery pending Decision on their Motion to Dismiss. If the Protective Order were granted, discovery could not occur until the standing issue has been resolved and only if it is in favor of the plaintiff.

Following is an excerpt from the response:

PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS BARACK H. OBAMA AND THE DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE’S MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER STAYING DISCOVERY PENDING DECISION ON DISPOSITVE MOTION

Plaintiff, Philip J. Berg, Esquire [hereinafter “Plaintiff”] files the within Response in Opposition to Defendants, Barack H. Obama [hereinafter “Obama”] and the Democratic National Committee [hereinafter “DNC’] Motion for Protective Order Staying Discovery Pending Decision on Defendants Dispositive Motion on the following grounds:

1. Defendants’ pending Motion to Dismiss does not entitle them to a Protective Order under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c) [hereinafter F.R.C.P. 26(c];

2. Defendants have failed to show “good cause” and are therefore not entitled to a protective order under F.R.C.P. 26(c);

3. Defendants have not pointed to any legitimate privacy concerns. Defendants have failed to point out any substantiated specific examples demonstrating that disclosure will cause a defined and serious injury;

4. Plaintiff does not seek access to the requested information for any improper purpose;

5. Defendants have not shown any risk that particularly serious embarrassment will result from the requested documents;

6. The requested information is extremely important for public safety; and “Good Cause” requires a particular need for the protection sought;

7. The sharing of information will promote fairness and efficiency so as not to delay this action;

8. Barack Obama, as U.S. Senator of Illinois and the Democratic Nominee for President of the United States, is a public person, and his citizenship status is a matter of significant public concern and is subject to legitimate public scrutiny. The Democratic National Committee is a public entity and is also subject to public scrutiny; and 9. The public interest in access to the requested information under the Freedom of Information Act 5 U.S.C. § 552 is a strong factor in favor of not granting a protective order which would prevent disclosure of such information.

[sometimeman]

Yes, this is a true incident, reported on our local KTRE TV, and in local papers. It made quite a splash locally, but apparently not on national news.

So On Wednesday the 1st of October I received a call on my cell while in the car with my husband. It was a woman who identified herself as calling from the Obama Campaign. The phone # she called from was 903-798-6020 which lists as "Obama Volunteers of Texarkana" ( Texas ).

She asked if I was an Obama supporter to which I replied: "No, I don't support him, your guy is a socialist who voted four times in the State Senate to let little babies die in hospital closets; I think you should find something better to do with your time." I hung up.

Thursday, October 2, I answered the front door to find the Secret Service. Immediately I thought of the call and was furious that apparently you are not allowed to call Obama a Socialist without the Secret Service coming to investigate. Instead, they asked me about the following comment, relayed by the Obama Volunteer of Texarkana who called me, unsolicited on my cell phone:

"I will never support Obama and he will wind up dead on a hospital floor."

My husband laughed and told them "No, she called him a socialist but she never said a word about him dying." I gave them my actual quote. The woman asked insolently "Oh? Well why would she make that up?"

I replied that I supposed she wasn't happy about what I said about her candidate and the Agent said "That's right, you were rude!" The last time I checked being rude wasn't a crime in America .

Luckily the big file they had gathered on me didn't indicate mental instability or a past life of stalking/crime, however they did want to know how I felt about Obama. That was my limit. I told the Agent in no uncertain terms that my thoughts were not pertinent to their investigation, that this was America and the last time I checked I was allowed to think whatever I wanted without being questioned by the Secret Service. In fact, even if I had said what she claimed, that isn't a threat. I told them (again) and my husband verified that the statement reported by Obama's volunteer was a lie. I asked them if there was a tape of the call and they said no. I said, "So on the word of a ticked off Obama supporter you are on my porch with no other evidence and you want to question me about my THOUGHTS!?"

They informed me that there was no evidence she was an Obama supporter.someone calling from his campaign.are you kidding?

I was not allowed to know the name of my accuser at which point they informed me that it wasn't like I was in a court of law, YET, as if this was a good thing. I recognized this as a veiled threat. I told them I would happily go to court since I did nothing wrong and at least then my accuser would have to face me rather than sending the thought police to my house.

They then said they were trying to do me a favor, that they came to me first before "embarrassing you by going to all your neighbors and family", another threat? I told them to be my guest and talk to whomever they wanted but they weren't going to investigate my thoughts on my porch.

They also informed me that it would be easier if the next time a supporter calls me I just say "Yeah sure count me in, or just hang up" apparently so she won't get her undies in a bundle and give them more useless trips. Yeah right. I said "Look, someone calls me unsolicited on my cell phone to ask me to support their candidate and I can't tell them why I don't?" I said I was sorry they made a wasted trip but if they had a problem with some made up lie they needed to go talk to her about it because it wasn't my fault they had to drive from Houston for nothing.

At one point I went inside and got a notepad to record their badge numbers and they refused to show me their badges. They had done the quick flip when they arrived. I asked for a card and the female Agent refused to give me one stating "You're not going to get a card." The male Agent gave me a card and told me I could contact Houston with any questions.

The fact that the volunteer lied, the fact that the Secret Service came to my house to question me about my thoughts and feelings and threaten to embarrass me to my neighbors and go to court if I didn't cooperate is not really the tragedy here. Because that girl on the phone doesn't have the pull to send the Secret Service to my home. Someone high in the ranks of a campaign working for a man who may be the next President of the United States of America felt comfortable bringing the force of the Federal Government to bear on a private citizen on nothing but the word of a partisan volunteer.

I want to file a counter complaint that false charges were made, that a false report was given to a peace officer. The Secret Service told me I cannot because they will protect the identity of the complainant. I also want the file they have on me destroyed and I want to know that my phone isn't tapped, etcetera. I am hearing a lot of "Out of my Jurisdiction".

Do I also hear jackboots?

Jessica Hughes

Lufkin, Texas

Note: I have contacted several news organizations, Rep Gohmert, Sen Hutchison, the Atty General, Local Police

Will keep you updated, pass it along.

[luckyme]

we'd be better off debunking his tax program.
we should let sen. Mc Cain know how we feel as well as our local reps. after all, we should remember it's the electoral college that elects our president.

Let your reps know how your voting!!

[fairplay]

OK you people it's getting down to the wire. I dare you to listen to this black preacher and what he has to say about Obama. call him a racist.



www.atlah.org/broadcast/ndnr10-17-08.html